Greg Koukl, a renowned Christian apologist, tackles the age-old problem of evil—the existence of suffering and wickedness in a world supposedly created by a benevolent, omnipotent God—with a unique perspective. He doesn't shy away from the challenging nature of this question, instead offering compelling arguments that aim to reconcile faith with the harsh realities of evil. This post delves into Koukl's approach, examining his key points and addressing common counterarguments.
What is Greg Koukl's Stance on the Problem of Evil?
Koukl doesn't offer a simple, pat answer to the problem of evil. Instead, he focuses on reframing the question and challenging the underlying assumptions often used to attack the existence of God. He argues that the existence of evil, while undeniably painful and perplexing, doesn't automatically disprove God's existence. His approach often involves turning the tables on skeptics, demonstrating the logical inconsistencies in their reasoning and highlighting the limitations of a purely materialistic worldview in explaining the origin and nature of morality.
Koukl frequently emphasizes the difference between logical and evidential arguments against God's existence. A logical argument attempts to demonstrate a contradiction within the concept of God, whereas an evidential argument points to specific evidence that supposedly contradicts God's existence. He masterfully addresses both types of arguments, showing how both often fail to adequately account for the complexities of reality and human experience.
How Does Koukl Address the Argument from Evil?
Koukl’s approach involves several key strategies:
The Free Will Defense:
Koukl acknowledges the free will defense, arguing that God, in creating beings with free will, accepted the possibility of evil as a consequence. This doesn't mean God caused evil, but rather that He allowed it as a necessary condition for genuine love, responsibility, and meaningful choice. A world without free will would be a world of puppets, devoid of genuine relationship and moral significance. He often highlights that the alternative – a world without free will – is arguably even more problematic than a world with evil.
The Greater Good Defense:
Koukl often points to the potential for good to emerge from suffering. While acknowledging the immense pain caused by evil, he suggests that God may allow suffering to achieve a greater good that we, with our limited perspectives, cannot fully comprehend. This could involve the development of character, empathy, and spiritual growth, even amidst immense hardship. He emphasizes that focusing solely on immediate suffering can blind us to the potential for long-term positive outcomes.
The Limited Understanding Argument:
Koukl underscores the limitations of human understanding. We are finite beings attempting to grasp an infinite God and an incomprehensible universe. Our perspective, colored by our limited experience and knowledge, may prevent us from fully comprehending God's purposes in allowing evil. What appears as senseless suffering from our vantage point may be part of a larger, divinely ordained plan.
Does Evil Prove God Doesn't Exist? (Addressing Common Counterarguments)
This question lies at the heart of Koukl's work. He often counters the claim that the presence of evil automatically negates God's existence by highlighting the following:
-
The problem of evil is not unique to theism: Atheistic worldviews also struggle to account for the origin of morality and the pervasive sense of injustice in the world. If God isn't the source of morality, what is? And how do we account for the seemingly inherent human desire for justice and fairness?
-
Evil exists in degrees: The suffering caused by natural disasters, for instance, differs significantly from the suffering inflicted by human cruelty. This distinction complicates simplistic arguments linking all suffering directly to God's actions or inactions.
-
The focus should be on the character of God: Koukl redirects the conversation from the mere existence of evil to the character of God. He argues that even if evil exists, the attributes of God (omnipotence, omniscience, omnibenevolence) remain a matter of faith and theological debate, rather than empirically verifiable facts.
Conclusion
Greg Koukl's approach to the problem of evil is not about providing easy answers, but about engaging in rigorous, thoughtful dialogue. He challenges both sides of the debate, forcing a deeper examination of the underlying assumptions and logical frameworks. His work is valuable not for providing definitive solutions, but for prompting critical thinking and stimulating productive conversation about faith, reason, and the enduring mystery of suffering.
